Is burning tokens in exchange for bonds deflationary
The below is in reference to basis-style algo stables, which issue bonds as a way to temporarily reduce the stablecoin supply to counteract de-peggings below one dollar.
Of course there are even more fundamental flaws in this design, but I do not recall seeing the below discussed, so decided to write it up:
- Bonds may inadvertently act as a substitute for the asset which they promise future payment of
- therefore reducing the “supply” of said asset less than expected
- due to also creating a competitive asset with similar, if somewhat riskier and less liquid, characteristics.
- therefore reducing the “supply” of said asset less than expected
- This potential substitution could undermine the intended role of bonds in the basis algorithmic stabilisation mechanism
- possibly resulting in bond issuance actually increasing the supply of basis-like assets
- rather than withdrawing basis from circulation.
- possibly resulting in bond issuance actually increasing the supply of basis-like assets
- The magnitude of this effect depends on the extent to which marginal currency holders are able to use bonds as a replacement to currency
- which depends on factors such as liquidity, legal frictions, default risks, financial system integration etc.
If you found this interesting, have feedback or are working on something related, let’s get in touch: twitter (@0xdist) or schedule a 30 min call
Distbit
Interested in econ, cryptoecon, agents, finance, epistemology, liberty.